As you may not be aware, AT&T followed through with their (I was hoping empty) threat to charge users “overages” for “excess” bandwidth usage. Never mind the fact that their service doesn’t even qualify for the international definition of “broadband”, as far as they’re concerned users are soaking up too much bandwidth already.
Since I personally think it odd that the main companies “cracking down” on “bandwidth hogs” (read: habitual streaming video users) are the ones that also offer some type of TV service, we ended up going with EarthLink for DSL service instead. The EarthLink sales guy told me that the order for DSL couldn’t go through until after we’d cancelled with AT&T – so I decided to wait on doing that until after the modem got here (in case our AT&T modem was no good for it). Well, AT&T up and cancelled our old DSL sunday night, leaving us without internet access until Tuesday.
So not only were we unable to watch any streaming video, or do anything that might spend any more bandwidth so we’re charged to the tune of $10 for 50GB (which is rough on a rather large family that all but has engravable plaques that say “Netflix: most content consumed, 2010″), but now we’re dead in the water as far as working goes.
We finally got it up and running this morning, but unfortunately it’s going slow. Really slow. 1/4 to 1/3rd the speed it’s supposed to be slow – which is crap, because we’re only a few hundred feet wire-length from the CO according to AT&T. Oh, which brings me to my next point…
… I don’t think our stint on Earthlink will be very long, because if I’m not mistaken, it looks like they simply resell AT&T out here. So I can’t imagine AT&T are going to lose a bunch of “bandwidth hogs” from paying them directly, but still keep them on their network and take it laying down. So we’ll have to wait and see what happens.